Happy Darwin Day! International Darwin Day Foundation

Happy Darwin Day! International Darwin Day Foundation
Happy Darwin Day!
Ever since Charles Darwin published his famous book, On The Origin of Species that there have been sporadic efforts to celebrate his accomplishments. One, with a recent but prolonged history, was initiated in 1980, at Salem College in Massachusetts. This weeklong event called the Darwin Festival continues to be held each year.
However, the history that leads directly to this Darwin Day Web site was initiated by Dr. Robert (“Bob”) Stephens and took place at Stanford University. The first EVENT sponsored by the Stanford Humanists student group and the Humanist Community, was held on April 22, 1995. The famous anthropologist Dr. Donald Johanson, who discovered the early fossil human called ‘Lucy’, gave a lecture entitled “Darwin and Human Origins” to over 600 people in the Kresge Auditorium.
In subsequent years the location and date of the celebration was changed to coincide with Darwin’s birthday and was held on, or near, February 12 each year. The success of the venture is reflected in the list of speakers which include Richard Dawkins, 1996; Paul Berg, 1997; Robert Sapolsky, 1998; Douglas Hofstadter, 1999; Michael Shermer, 2001; Robert Stephens and Arthur Jackson, 2003; Robert and Lola Stephens, 2004; and Eugenie Scott, 2005.
In the intervening years, after the original Darwin Day Celebration was established, Bob worked with other groups to expand the idea of celebrating Science and Humanity. Modern cultures, which rely so heavily on scientific knowledge which was developed solely on the basis of human curiosity and ingenuity, had not developed a tradition by which to show appreciation for this phenomenal knowledge system which is largely responsible for providing all of us with the standard of health and prosperity that we enjoy today. Therefore, the Darwin Day celebration was seen as an authentic way to show appreciation to all those, both past and present, who have contributed to the scientific enterprise. The overall goal of the original concept was to recognize the achievements of humanity as represented in the acquisition of verifiable scientific knowledge.
Enjoy reading Charles Darwin’s Beagle Diary day by day.,…
http://darwinbeagle.blogspot.ca/

Why Exploring Life's Key Questions Feb Mar 2013, Knox College

Why Exploring Life's Key Questions Feb Mar 2013
Exploring Life's Key Questions
When: Wednesday Feb 6, 13, 27 and Mar 6 5:30 to 7:00pm
Where: Room 3 of Knox College (56 St.George Street)
Details:All events are free and a pizza dinner is included

Topics:
Wed Feb 6. What is the meaning of life?
Wed Feb 13 Why is murder wrong? To whom are we responsible?
Wed Feb 27 Does science have limits?
Wed Mar 6 Why do bad things happen to good people?

Featuring:
(Atheist)Dr. Larry Moran, (Buddhist) Marco Mascarin, (Christian) Dr. Kirk Durston, Dr. Alex Philp, Dr. Scot Masso, Dr. Andy Bannister, (Humanist) Dr. Gail McCabe, (Jewish) Rabbi Aaron Katchen, (Muslim) Dr. Shabir Ally, (Sikh) Santbir Singh and Other

Sponsored by: U of T Multi-Faith Centre, Secular Alliance at U of T, Muslim Students Association UofT,
and Power to Change at U of T

For more information please email nadir.shirazi@utoronto.ca 

Darwin Day Panel: Clergy Project and Post Theological World, Sat Feb 9, 3:30, MFC

DARWIN DAY PANEL:The Clergy Project & the Post Theological World:  How a community for non-believing religious leaders came to exist and what Darwin has to do with it.
Speakers:   Catherine Dunphy, former Chaplain, now acting Executive Director of the Clergy Project and Teresa MacBain, former Methodist Pastor, now PR Director for American Atheists; will speak about the Clergy Project, an online community for non-believing religious leaders. "Leaving faith for the embrace of reason, freethinking and secularism wasn't an easy process, but thanks to Darwin and his 'Dangerous Idea'* the evidence was just too hard to ignore.

Saturday, Feb 9, 2013, 3;30-5pm
Multifaith Centre @ Koffler House.
569 Spadina Ave. Toronto, ON M5S 2J7

We intend this event to be a collaboration between: UTSA, Cafe Scientifique, York FreeSAY, encouraged and supported by the Ontario Humanist Society

"Call Me Kuchi", Queer Spirits Film Festival, Innis, Feb 6

'Call Me Kuchu' documents the recent gay  rights movement in Uganda and the murder of Ugandan gay rights  activist David Kato, by religiously motivated homophobia. That  screening is part of the Queer Spirits! Film Festival, this Wednesday,  Feb. 6, 7 pm at Innis College.

http://www.multifaith.utoronto.ca/Events-And-Programs/Qu%28e%29erying-Religion-Queer-Spirits-Film-Festival-J.htm

U of T students protest government inaction on climate change

U of T students protest government inaction on climate change | rabble.ca
They’re young, passionate about environmental causes and deeply concerned about the future of our planet.
So naturally they’re upset with federal, provincial and territorial governments that, by 2020, will only reach the halfway mark of Canada's goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 17 per cent below 2005 levels.
“It’s so important for people our age to get involved in the climate movement,” said Tom McCarthy, an organizer with the University of Toronto Environmental Action (UTEA), a group that advocates for more effective government policy on climate change and other environmental issues at the federal, provincial, and municipal levels.
“If we don’t take this seriously and don’t start to push the people in power to make the changes that need to happen now, then we’re in big trouble.”
On Friday morning, more than 60 people, including students and community members, marched from Convocation Hall at the University of Toronto to the steps of the Ontario legislature to send a clear message to the new leader of the Liberal party and Premier of Ontario.
“Young people are not going to quietly accept an out of control environment and a broken environmental inheritance from our parent’s generation,” said McCarthy.“Little has been accomplished by our elected leaders in the fight to reduce emissions and prepare for an uncertain future of droughts, food stress and extreme weather.”
McCarthy and his colleagues came to Queen’s Park to deliver an open letter to the new Premier. The same letter was later sent to the Prime Minister and the other Premiers across the country.
These students are frustrated by having little, if any, input into the climate change decisions made by the federal and provincial governments.
“Yet we are the ones who will pay the future costs resulting from the failure to take effective action to reduce emissions,” said McCarthy.

DATE CHANGE for DARWIN DAY SYMPOSIUM, FEB 9, 3:30-5

The Clergy Project & the Post Theological World:  How a community for non-believing religious leaders came to exist and what Darwin has to do with it.
Speakers:   Catherine Dunphy, former Chaplain, now acting Executive Director of the Clergy Project and Teresa MacBain, former Methodist Pastor, now PR Director for American Atheists; will speak about the Clergy Project, an online community for non-believing religious leaders.

Leaving faith for the embrace of reason, freethinking and secularism wasn't an easy process, but thanks to Darwin and his Dangerous Idea* the evidence was just too hard to ignore.

Event details:
Saturday, Feb 9, 2013, 3;30-5pm
Multifaith Centre @ Koffler House.
569 Spadina Ave.
Toronto, ON M5S 2J7
(TTC, Driving Instructions and map here
http://www.multifaith.utoronto.ca/Contact-Us--Book-Space.htm)
Koffler House is on Spadina Circle, the entrance is from Bancroft Avenue, next to the GSU Grad Club Pub.

We intend this event to be a collaboration between: UTSA, Cafe Scientifique, York FreeSAY, encouraged and supported by the Ontario Humanist Society,
 
ABOUT THE CLERGY PROJECT
The Clergy Project is a confidential online community for active and former clergy who do not hold supernatural beliefs. It is a 'safe house' where members can freely discuss the challenges they face in leaving ministry and establishing a new life. You can visit our public website at  http://clergyproject.org.
*Dennett, Daniel. Darwin's Dangerous Idea; Simon and Schuster, 1995

Catherine Dunphy
Catherine is the acting Executive Director for the Clergy Project. She is a former Roman Catholic Chaplain who left the church when she recognized that she was no longer a believer. Catherine completed both an undergraduate and masters degree in Theology (at UofT and St Francis Xavier). As one of the original 52 members of the project, Catherine has been volunteering to help organize the Clergy Project from the beginning. She reports to the volunteer Board of Directors and she is actively working on projects to benefit Clergy Project members. Catherine is a Communications Professional who never looked back once she left the church.

Teresa MacBain
 Teresa  became a non-believer after more than twenty years of ministry. She started her career in ministry serving along side her father, a Baptist minister. She taught in Christian Schools, served as a worship pastor, associate pastor and senior pastor. Teresa received her bachelor’s degree from Samford University in Christian Education followed by her Masters in Divinity from Duke Divinity School. Teresa holds the distinction of being the first female graduate of The Clergy Project and as our first acting Executive Director. As a former minister, Teresa brings a broad understanding of the religious lifestyle and its effects on personal wellbeing to the nontheist movement. She’s a dynamic and entertaining public speaker with a heartfelt compassion for those struggling to completely free themselves from their religion. Teresa was the Public Relations Director for American Atheists and is now the Executive Director of Humanists of Florida, she remains a Clergy Project Board Member.

Alber Saber: Brotherhood will drive the people to secularism -

Alber Saber: Brotherhood will drive the people to secularism - Daily News Egypt
Alber Saber was arrested in August 2012 on charges of contempt of religion. Saber’s mother called the police asking for protection as a mob surrounded the house. An outspoken blogger who posted many videos critical of religion, Saber was sentenced to three years in prison in December and appealed the decision. He was released for the first time in four months and left Egypt on 26 January, the day of his appeal session.  This is an excerpt from the interview, which can be read online.  This article is reposted from the International Humanist and Ethical Union (FB) page.


Why did you decide to leave the country?
I did not want to leave. If it were up to me I would stay and defend myself even if I were to be executed, but many people were suffering because of me and had already suffered enough.
There was nothing I could do but listen to those around me who have suffered because of me and my cause. People congratulate me on leaving. How can I be happy away from my family, friends and loved ones?
The people who should be congratulated are the ones in power. The Egyptian government is now safe from the shameful position they took.They are safe from the criticism that initially forced them to let me go. They are safe from the possibility of me actually gaining my rights and the rights of many others.
Congratulations should be offered to those ruling Egypt with backward laws that violate the most basic of human rights.
What was your security situation when you got out of prison? Did you go back to your old house or did you have to relocate?
When I was released I left from the security directorate instead of the police station because I had been attacked earlier when I was at the station.A high rank at the directorate, I don’t know his name, told me not to go back to my neighbourhood because they would be unable to protect me. He was not threatening me.
How do you feel about the fact that your lawyers tried to defend you by arguing that you did not say what you were accused of saying; rather than argue that you had the right to say it regardless of whom it offended?
I refuse to deny what I said. I did compare religions and discuss their differences, I did critique and criticise them. I never denied my atheism. Yes I am an atheist and I am not afraid to admit it.These are my opinions and they are based on serious studies in comparative religion. I know what I am talking about, whether it is dogma, jurisprudence or history. I am a philosophy major and I studied a lot about religion.
My lawyers know that this is a difficult case, however, and that society might not accept it, so they asked me not to speak in court.
Tell me about your experience in prison
The case was impartial from the start. We called the police to ask for help since a mob was surrounding our house and threatening me.
When the police showed up, two hours late, they stayed downstairs until the people started setting fire to the building. Mostly Christian residents live in the building so the whole thing might have escalated into sectarian clashes.The police then decided to arrest me instead of protecting me. The person writing up the report at the police station was being dictated to.
The senior officer said I was to be put in solitary confinement while being held on remand but a junior officer threw me in a normal cell with six criminals.[The junior officer] cursed me; he cursed my mother, and then took me to another cell and incited the prisoners against me, telling them that I insulted Islam and Christianity.
One of them cut my throat with a razor blade. [The officer] knew who it was but did nothing.
He took me to a third cell and told the prisoners not to allow me to sleep and to have me sit by the toilet all night.
How did you arrive to the decision to become an atheist?
My journey towards this decision was in the period between 2001 and 2005. I had decided that I would not simply inherit religion. Faith here is hereditary; if your parents are Christian, you’re Christian. You have it written on your birth certificate before you can even think. And it is the same for Muslims.
In 2001 I decided to read about other religions. My thinking at the time was that I was born a Christian but I had not actually decided that for myself nor had I considered other religions. I felt like there could be a chance that my religion is the wrong one and that God would punish me for it since I did not seek out all the options first.
I spoke to a lot of people, including religious leaders and clerics from several faiths, I read a lot of books, and eventually I realised that religion was merely a way to find God, but that there were so many different religions, and even inside each religion there were many sects, so why did each claim a monopoly on God? Why did they all claim they were going to heaven and everyone else was not?
The circle then started to get wider. When I first started this journey I felt that religion could be easily disputed but I still believed in the existence of a god, so I had a limit, which was the existence of a creator deity. After reading and researching the issue I started to break out of this limit and think that there might not even be a god at all. I eventually decided that it did not make sense to me and I became an atheist.
What drove you to go public with your atheism amidst a period of religious zeal in an already socially and religiously conservative society?
From my studies I have learned that Middle Eastern communities have a trinity of taboos that are not to be spoken about: sex, politics and religion. When I started university in 2001 I had already been talking about politics. I remember at the time we still had presidential referendums, not elections, and I was outspoken on the issue.
I was involved in activism and wanted to join Kefaya and started taking to the streets at the time of the 6 April [strike actions] in 2008. Do you think someone who would take to the streets before the revolution and who chanted against Mubarak would be afraid to reveal their beliefs?
Did you face any difficulties over the decision to go public with it?
The Islamists in university subjected me to three assassination attempts.
Their leader and I had a political discussion once on the train and we became friends, I did not know who he was but my friends told me later.
After that I started to gain a reputation for my views that are critical of religion, mostly because of what I said in comparative religion classes. The Islamist youth leader decided that I was too dangerous.
He started sending members of his group after me, they constantly tried to start fights with me so that they could beat me up but I would not rise to their taunts and my friends were also looking out for me.
What about the Church and the Coptic community at large? You come from a Coptic background, how did your family and those around you react?
My parents knew since I was young that they could not control me and that I do what’s on my mind regardless of what others think. If I am not convinced by something I don’t do it.Furthermore, they were democratic in that we would discuss things and agree to disagree without any problems arising.
So there was nothing they could do really. Their son is not convinced by their religion and that’s that.
In what way, if any, should religion manifest itself in politics?
Religion is divided into dogma and jurisprudence; it should have nothing to do with politics. Religion is unrelated to who I should elect and no one should be saying vote for this candidate so that you go to heaven. A secular state is not blasphemy.
Religious jurisprudence is a legal concept though; does it not have political connotations?
It is the law within the religion; people should not have to follow it. I am against marriage through the church, for example. I believe we should have civil marriages. The people not the clergy should enact laws.
I believe that we need to break the trinity of taboos I spoke about earlier. Many of the people are not intellectuals even if they are educated; they do not read a lot. We have just come out of an oppressive age and regime; an authoritarian regime does not pay attention to education and in fact tries to ruin it. If the people are ignorant they are easier to oppress.
How, realistically, can Egypt become a secular state, especially in light of the Islamist domination on the political sphere?
We have a movement here in Egypt called “secularists” for example and they take to the streets and raise awareness about the issue. I believe in confrontation. I used to debate Muslim Brotherhood members on secularism before the presidential elections.
However, the way to achieve state secularism is through raising awareness. It is the same way we were able to revolt. We raised awareness amongst the people that we are not just silly youth and that our demands were for their benefit. Eventually they joined us or at least stopped opposing us.
Everyone in Egypt is talking politics right now. We should start political campaigns explaining what the word “secularism” actually means. We need to explain separation of religion and state and how the state is an institution and cannot adopt a specific religion. We need to explain things like dictatorship of the majority and how democracy also means protecting the rights of minorities.
What do you think about the term “civil” as in civil state?
All the politicians are only looking out for their interests so naturally they will use a misleading euphemism like “civil state” since they cannot openly call for secularism or face the Islamists. And it is their fear that brought us to the mess we are in right now. I do not believe in a civil state, a civil state is a state ruled by civilians. A non-religious state is called a secular state and that is what we should call it....